Home
Search
GM Crop News
Who we are
Publications

Projects

Expertise
> GM Annual Global Study
> EU missing-out on GM crop benefits
> GM crops yield impacts
> GM crops impact on UK farm profitability
> Co-existence of GM and non GM crops
> Bt maize in Spain
> Roundup Ready Soybeans in Romania
> Novel Foods
 

Useful Links

> Liability
> Market dynamics
> GM Debate
> GM crops & organics
> Crop Profitability
Site Map
Contact
     

EU losing out on contributions to sustainable farming from biotech traits[1]

June 8th 2009, Dorchester, Dorset: New study shows GM insect resistant (GM IR) maize[2] has delivered important economic and environmental benefits but only a small part of the potential benefit is currently being realised.

 “GM insect resistant maize adoption by EU farmers has contributed to reducing insecticide spraying, improved the quality of maize and significantly boosted farmers’ incomes,” said Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, and author of the report. “The technology has made important contributions to increasing yields, reducing production risks and improving productivity.  These benefits are, however, being denied to farmers and citizens alike in several maize-growing EU Member States, with the biggest losers being the very countries which have effectively banned the use of the technology; Italy, France, Germany and Austria”

 Previewing the findings of the comprehensive study, the key findings are:     

  • In maize growing regions affected by corn boring pests, the main impact has been higher yields compared to conventional maize (average yield benefits of +10%);
  • In 2007, users of GM IR maize[3] earned average, additional income levels of +€186/ha (range of +€25 to +€201/ha).  Across all users of the technology, the total increase in farm income directly attributable to the technology in 2007 was +€20.6 million;
  • In certain regions, GM IR maize has delivered important improvements in grain quality from significant reductions in the levels of mycotoxins found in the grain;
  • Where maize growers have traditionally used insecticides to control corn boring pests, the switch to using GM IR technology has resulted in important reductions in insecticides use and its associated environmental impact (notably in Spain);
  • The potential EU adoption area for GM IR maize is between 2.25 million ha and 4 million ha, depending on the annual levels of pest pressure.  At these levels of adoption, the annual direct farm income benefit potential is €160 million and €247 million.  Across the EU only between 8% and 12% of this total potential benefit is being realised;
  • The countries currently foregoing the largest economic gains from GM IR maize technology are Italy, France and Germany, followed by Austria and Romania;
  • Annual savings of between 0.41 million kg and 0.7 million kg of insecticide active ingredient could be realised if GM IR maize technology was used on its full potential area.  At present, only between 14% and 25% of the total potential environmental benefit from reduced insecticide use is being realised;
  • Spain is the only EU member state where GM IR maize adoption levels are currently delivering farm income and environmental gains at or near full potential levels;
  • The countries currently foregoing the largest environmental benefits that might reasonably be realised from the use of GM IR maize are Italy, France and Germany[4].

For additional information, contact Graham Brookes.  Tel 00 44 (0) 1531 650123

www.pgeconomics.co.uk


[1] Download Full report .  This report also updates a previous study (using the same methodology), available on the same website and in the peer review scientific journal, International Journal of Biotechnology (2008, vol 10, 2/3).

[2] The only GM trait currently permitted for commercial farming use in the EU

[3] On about 110,000 hectares across the EU

[4] Austria and Romania lose out significantly in economic terms but less so environmentally, because use of insecticides for corn borer control in conventional maize production is a much less practiced corn borer control measure in these countries compared to Italy, France, and Germany

 

 

Co-existence of Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM Maize

DEFRA consultation on proposals for the management of genetically modified (GM), conventional and organic crops

The Global GM Market - implications for the European food chain - German - French language

Co-existence in North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and organic crops?

PG Economics comments on the Greenpeace paper ‘GM and dairy cow feed: steps to a GM-free future for the UK dairy industry’

Comments on GM Foods: evaluating the Farm Scale Trials: report of the Environmental Audit Committee of 2 March 2004
 

GM and non GM arable crops can co-exist in the EU without problems
 

 

 

 


Independent and objective consultants servicing the agricultural, agricultural supply trade, rural and food industries.


©PG Economics Limited 2004-2009
Registered Office: Stafford House, 10 Prince of Wales Road, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1PW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1300 321501 (P Barfoot) +44 (0)1531 650123 (G Brookes) Fax: +44 (0)1531 650099

www.pgeconomics.co.uk

Disclaimer: A number of different sources of information were used in compiling PG Economics reports and website files. Our reports and files contain some forecasts and estimates. It therefore remains possible that the reports and web files contain inaccuracies. PG Economics and its Directors do not accept any liability arising from any such errors or omissions and shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any information given in its publications and website.