Home
Search
GM Crop News
Who we are
Publications

Projects

Expertise
> GM 10 Global Study
> GM Food Avoidence expensive
> GM Crops in Poland
> GM crops impact on UK farm profitability
> Co-existence of GM and non GM crops
> Bt maize in Spain
> Roundup Ready Soyabeans in Romania
Useful Links

>Farm Scale Trials

>Liability
>Market dynamics
>GM Debate
>GM crops & organics
>GM crops & LDC's
>GM yields
>GM pesticide use
Site Map
Contact
     

Fact Sheet: Bt technology

 

Bt is the term commonly used to indicate proteins extracted from a bacterium (called Bacillus thuringiensis) which is present naturally in the soil worldwide. This bacterium has long been used in organic Bt insecticide preparations. A unique feature of this bacterium is its production of crystal-like proteins that selectively kill specific groups of insects. These crystal proteins (Cry proteins) are insect stomach poisons that must be eaten to kill the insect. Once eaten, an insect's own digestive enzymes activate the toxic form of the protein. The Cry proteins bind to specific "receptors" on the intestinal lining and rupture the cells. Insects stop feeding within two hours of a first bite and, if enough toxin is eaten, die within two or three days.

Biotechnology has made it possible to use Bt proteins more effectively to control insects that are harmful to crops.

The genes coding for these proteins are actually introduced into the plant, enabling it to produce the protein continuously and so protect itself against attacks from insect pests.

Benefits

ˇ Means of control for insect pests, which is more specific than conventional insecticides;

ˇ Reduced usage of conventional insecticides (using Bt technology reduces the need for recourse to conventional insecticides);

ˇ Reduced requirement for energy and for inputs associated with the use of such products;

ˇ Means of insect control that is more environmentally friendly.

Benefits for the environment

ˇ The Bt proteins act on a narrow range of insects (Lepidoptera only) and are therefore very unlikely to harm non-target species.

ˇ Conventional crop protection agents allow control of many different insect pests, but are also somewhat toxic to certain non-target species.

ˇ Using more selective means of controlling insects, such as Bt transgenic crops, has environmental advantages. In addition, the reduced usage of conventional synthetic insecticides leads to reduced consumption of energy and of the inputs needed for their manufacture, packaging, transport and storage.

Benefits for farmers

ˇ Crops expressing Bt proteins offer farmers an environmentally friendly way to control insect pests.

ˇ The use of Bt crops avoids the need to handle chemical insecticides. These are perfectly safe if handled properly, but can be a hazard if used incorrectly or spilt.

ˇ In contrast, there is enough toxicological data from Bt cotton crops to show that there is probably no risk associated with use of the Cry1Ac delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis or with the genetic material needed to produce these Bt plants.

ˇ This is a realistic solution for farmers when it comes to insect control.

Current situation

ˇ Bt insecticides have already been used for 60 years, and are permitted for use by
organic farmers.

ˇ Crops incorporating the Bt technology first went on sale in 1996, in the form of cotton protected against a caterpillar pest.

ˇ Bt technology is available for crops of cotton, fodder maize and sweet corn and
potatoes.

   


 

Photographs 1: Conventional cotton damaged by an insect pest (left) and a cotton plant protected against the insect as a result of Bt technology (right).

Sources
- Berry, C "Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxins" (2000) (Accessed 29/09/00)

- Consumer Alert, Regulation of agricultural biotechnology in the U.S. 2000.

- Crickmore, N., Zeigler, D.R., Schnepf, E., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J, Bravo, A. and Dean, D.H. Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature. 2000 (Accessed 29/09/00)

- Crop Data Management Services, Inc. "Labels/MSDS" . (Accessed 29/09/00). Available on the world wide web

- Economic Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Update: Impacts of adapting genetically engineered crops in the United States. 2000. (Accessed 29/09/00)

- Farmsource, "Bollgard Cotton: Cotton's Self-Defense System Against Worms", 1999. (Accessed 29/09/00).

- Farmsource, "YieldGard Corn: The Whole Plant, The Whole Season", 2000. (Accessed 29/09/00).

- Felsott, A. Insecticidal genes, Part 1: from tight fit to uptight. 2000. Agrichemical and Environmental News. 167:7-16.

- Felsott, A. Insecticidal genes, Part 2: Human Health Hoopla. 2000. Agrichemical and Environmental News. 168:2-9

- Felsott, A. Insecticidal genes, Part 4: Resisting resistance. 2000. Agrichemical and Environmental News. 170:8-17.

- Gianessi, L and J. Carpenter, "Agricultural Biotechnology: Insect Control Benefits" 1999. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy.

- NatureMark Newleaf, "Pest control starts with Newleaf potatoes" 1996. (Accessed 29/09/00)

- Tabashnick, B. Evolution of reistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. 1994. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39:47-79.

- Tabashnick, B, T. Malvar, Y. Liu, N. Finson, D. Borthakur, B. Shin, S. Park, L. Masson, R. de Maagd and D. Bosch, Cross-resistance of the Diamondback moth indicates altered interactions with domain II of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. 1996. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(8): 2839-2844.

- United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA and USDA position paper on insect resistance management in Bt crops. 1999 (Accessed 29/09/00).

- United States Environmental Protection Agency, Executive summary for profenfos, 1999. (Accessed 29/09/00) on the World Wide Web.

- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticide Fact Sheet Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab Delta-Endotoxin and the Genetic Material Necessary for Its Production in Corn [MON 810] (006430). 2000 (Accessed 29/09/00)

- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticide Fact Sheet Bacillus thuringiensis CryIII(A) delta endotoxin and the genetic material necessary for its production in potato (006432). 2000 (Accessed 29/09/00)

- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticide Fact Sheet Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Cry1Ac Delta-Endotoxin and Its Controlling Sequences as Expressed in Cotton 2000(006445). (Accessed 29/09/00)

- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pesticide Programs, 2000, (Accessed 29/09/00) van Frankenhuyzen, K. and C. Nystrom, "The Bacillus thuringiensis toxin specificity database" (1999) /Bacillus/Bt_HomePage/netintro99.htm (accessed 29/09/00)

Source: Europabio

 

  Full Report on GM Bt maize in Spain - PDF format

GM Maize in Spain

GM Maize in Spain Summary

Bt Fact Sheet

European Corn Borer Fact Sheet

Long term success of Bt corn on controlling European Corn Borer

 

 

 


Independent and objective consultants servicing the agricultural, agricultural supply trade, rural and food industries.


ŠPG Economics Limited 2004-2008
Registered Office: Stafford House, 10 Prince of Wales Road, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1PW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1300 321501 (P Barfoot) +44 (0)1531 650123 (G Brookes) Fax: +44 (0)1531 650099

www.pgeconomics.co.uk

Disclaimer: A number of different sources of information were used in compiling PG Economics reports and website files. Our reports and files contain some forecasts and estimates. It therefore remains possible that the reports and web files contain inaccuracies. PG Economics and its Directors do not accept any liability arising from any such errors or omissions and shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any information given in its publications and website.