Home
Search
GM Crop News
Who we are
Publications

Projects

Expertise
> GM 10 Global Study
> GM Food Avoidence expensive
> GM Crops in Poland
> GM crops impact on UK farm profitability
> Co-existence of GM and non GM crops
> Bt maize in Spain
> Roundup Ready Soyabeans in Romania
Useful Links

>Farm Scale Trials

>Liability
>Market dynamics
>GM Debate
>GM crops & organics
>GM crops & LDC's
>GM yields
>GM pesticide use
Site Map
Contact
     

Consultancy support for the analysis of the impact of GM crops on UK farm profitability

 


Executive Summary

Objectives
This report reviews literature on the economic impact of genetically modified crops and places this within the context of UK arable farming. Its primary function has been to provide objective information and analysis that can help the Strategy Unit of the Cabinet Office in its work on the possible economic impacts of GM crops on UK farmers.

Background context to GM crop development and adoption

  • Over the last few years there have been declining prices for most arable crops (notably cereals) and falling levels of profitability;
     
  • The economic performance of farms can vary widely, both between and within regions. This means that the potential impact of a new piece of technology (eg, GM cost reducing technology) will be subject to significant variation in impact at a local level;
     
  • The underlying policy environment, set by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is changing. Levels of support are decreasing and the EU market is opening up to increasing levels of competition from world markets. To remain as competitive as possible, many UK producers are likely to explore all forms of new technology that can assist them (eg, through yield enhancement, cost reductions). The planting of GM crops could be an approach taken provided farmers perceive that there is a market for the produce. Others may look at other cost reducing technologies, focus on higher value, niche product production, like organics, where cost is less of a market driver, join agri-environmental schemes that target the delivery of environment and landscape goods for the wider public or leave the sector;
     
  • Recent market changes of relevance to UK farming include the growth in demand for products that are perceived to better meet the demands of consumer concerns about the environment, health and production systems (eg, development of markets for organic produce). On the supply side, there has been significant development of more sophisticated supply systems that incorporate identity preservation and traceability. As a result an increasing number of farmers are now members of independently accredited, quality assurance schemes. There has also been greater adoption of ‘more integrated crop management systems’ (eg, less use of prophylactic spray regimes in favour of spraying according to pest and disease thresholds);
     
  • New technologies take time to come to the market place. Thus the lifting of any moratorium on GM crop approval in the EU does not mean that GM crops will immediately be made available to farmers. Regulatory and seed approval procedures and requirements mean that the first GM crops that might be available to UK arable farmers are still 2-4 years away.
     

Continue to page 2

 

Full report published by the UK Cabinet Office Strategy Unit - PDF

Executive Summary

PG Economics comments on the Greenpeace paper ‘GM and dairy cow feed: steps to a GM-free future for the UK dairy industry’


Independent and objective consultants servicing the agricultural, agricultural supply trade, rural and food industries.


©PG Economics Limited 2004-2008
Registered Office: Stafford House, 10 Prince of Wales Road, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1PW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1300 321501 (P Barfoot) +44 (0)1531 650123 (G Brookes) Fax: +44 (0)1531 650099

www.pgeconomics.co.uk

Disclaimer: A number of different sources of information were used in compiling PG Economics reports and website files. Our reports and files contain some forecasts and estimates. It therefore remains possible that the reports and web files contain inaccuracies. PG Economics and its Directors do not accept any liability arising from any such errors or omissions and shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any information given in its publications and website.