Home
Search
GM Crop News
Who we are
Publications

Projects

Expertise
> GM 10 Global Study
> GM Food Avoidence expensive
> GM Crops in Poland
> GM crops impact on UK farm profitability
> Co-existence of GM and non GM crops
> Bt maize in Spain
> Roundup Ready Soyabeans in Romania
Useful Links

>Farm Scale Trials

>Liability
>Market dynamics
>GM Debate
>GM crops & organics
>GM crops & LDC's
>GM yields
>GM pesticide use
Site Map
Contact
     

Consultancy support for the analysis of the impact of GM crops on UK farm profitability

 


Executive Summary continued - return to previous page

Possible impact of GM technology on potatoes grown in the UK 

Key profitability features of the crop

Profitability (as measured by gross margins) in 2002 was within a range of £2,000 and £2,683/ha[1].  It accounted for about 4% of the total UK arable crop area in 2002. 

Total variable costs in 2002 were within a range of £1,720/ha and £1,870/ha for main crop potatoes, of which herbicides accounted for between 3% and 4% of costs, fungicides accounted for about 8% of variable costs and nematicides accounted for about 14%-16% of variable costs.  Average yields were about 44 tonnes/ha in 2002. 

GM traits of relevance to the UK

The main UK applicable GM potato research is related to nematode resistance[2].  However, this research is still at a fairly fundamental level and is at least ten years away from possible commercialisation.  No analysis of possible impacts on the UK potato grower has been provided because there is no data ‘to work on’ from trials, as no field scale trials examining impacts on yields, costs of production etc have yet been established. 

Possible impact of GM technology on forage maize grown in the UK 

Key profitability features of the crop

As forage maize is mostly consumed on-farm, the key variables influencing whether it is grown are not profitability but nutritional value relative to other forage crops and the cost of production.  In recent years the area planted to the crop has increased to about 100,000 hectares (relative to for example about 420,000 ha for oilseed rape), highlighting its cost competitiveness with alternatives such as whole wheat and permanent pasture.   

GM traits of relevance to the UK

The main UK applicable GM forage maize research has been related to herbicide tolerant (to glufosinate) forage maize.  The potential applicability, adoption and impact on UK farming profitability of this product is summarised in Table e.  For further details the reader should read section 5.5 and appendix 5. 

Table e: Summary of possible farm level economic impact of GM herbicide tolerant (to glufosinate) forage maize

Possible date for commercialisation in the UK

2005-2008

Impact on costs of production

The range of current herbicide costs is between £15/ha to £42.2/ha.  The likely cost under the glufosinate tolerant crop is (one application) £25/ha to £30.44/ha rising to between £54-£60.88/ha for two applications.  However, the current ‘ alternative’ costs are likely to rise because the main herbicide currently used (atrazine) may be banned.  If so, costs could rise to about £55.01/ha.  On the basis of these costs, glufosinate tolerant forage maize would provide the largest cost savings for farmers who currently use two sprays and could revert to one application of glufosinate (also it would be attractive if atrazine were to be banned).  Where farmers would need to use two applications of glufosinate the cost savings would be significantly reduced and may be marginal. 

Impact on yield

Current herbicides used may adversely affect yield via ‘knock back’ (eg, slow down rate of seed germination).  Detailed data is not available on this impact but the use of a post-emergent contact broad-spectrum herbicide, such as glufosinate, that does not “knock-back” the plant could increase yields by between 10% and 20%.  A 10% increase in yield equates to an additional 1.19 tonnes of maize dry matter which costs £46.70 (based on £39.38/t X 1.19) to produce. 

 

Given the limited nature of the possible cost saving benefit identified above, take up of this technology in forage maize will probably depend on its ability to deliver the yield benefits suggested above.  If not, and after taking into consideration the technology fee, the benefits will be limited to only some farmers.  It may necessitate a fairly low technology fee and/or be accompanied by a reduction in the herbicide price (of glufosinate) to facilitate take up.  This analysis is however speculative and is not based on empirical evidence of herbicide tolerant forage maize grown in the UK (as no publicly available empirical evidence was identified). 

Notes.

1.   For consideration of generic issues such as herbicide tolerant weed resistance, volunteers and co-existence issues see sub-section above

2.   In relation to whether there is a market for GM forage maize, as all of the crop is fed to livestock, there is likely to be a reasonable market for GM forage maize

[1] Can vary widely on an annual basis due to yield and price variations and therefore can be one of the most profitable crops in the UK one year but not so the next. 

[2] Herbicide tolerance, insect resistant (to Colorado Potato Beetle: CPB) and virus resistant potatoes have all previously been commercialised in North America (or in the case of herbicide tolerance were close to commercialisation).  However, there is little prospect of these products coming to the market in the UK over the next few years because a) the original technology provider, Monsanto has withdrawn from the potato sector, b) CPB is not a problem in the UK, so there would be no market and c) weeds are not a major problem to UK potato growers (relative to nematodes, viruses and fungal diseases).


Continue to page 9

 

Full report published by the UK Cabinet Office Strategy Unit - PDF

Executive Summary

 


Independent and objective consultants servicing the agricultural, agricultural supply trade, rural and food industries.


©PG Economics Limited 2004-2008
Registered Office: Stafford House, 10 Prince of Wales Road, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1PW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1300 321501 (P Barfoot) +44 (0)1531 650123 (G Brookes) Fax: +44 (0)1531 650099

www.pgeconomics.co.uk

Disclaimer: A number of different sources of information were used in compiling PG Economics reports and website files. Our reports and files contain some forecasts and estimates. It therefore remains possible that the reports and web files contain inaccuracies. PG Economics and its Directors do not accept any liability arising from any such errors or omissions and shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any information given in its publications and website.