|
Press release 23 June
2004
PG
Economics Ltd today announced the release of its latest research paper on GM
and non GM crop co-existence
Co-existence in
North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and
organic crops?
The
key findings of the report are:
- GM
crops have been, and continue to co-exist with conventional and organic
crops in North America (where GM crops account for the majority of
plantings of important arable crops like soybeans, oilseed rape and
maize), without causing any economic or marketing problems to non GM or
organic growers.
-
Claims by anti GM groups that GM and non GM crops cannot co-exist in North
America are greatly exaggerated, given the on-farm experiences since 1995.
-
The market has developed practical, proportionate and workable
co-existence measures without government intervention. These have been
delivering effective co-existence for nearly nine years.
These
conclusions are based on the experiences of North American arable farmers
in successfully implementing and managing the co-existence of GM and non GM
crops, as well as specialist crops with other crops, for many years.
Impact on organic farmers
Survey evidence amongst US organic farmers (2003) shows that the vast
majority (96%) have not experienced any loss of organic sales or downgrading
of produce as a result of GM adventitious presence having been found in
their crops. Where a small number (4%) report some losses/downgrading this
has been due to a marketing decision taken by their certifying body or
customer rather than any requirement under national organic regulations.
Growth of the GM crop area has not impeded the development of organic crops
The
US organic areas of soybeans and corn have increased by 270% and 187%
respectively between 1995 and 2001,
a period in which GM crops were introduced and reached 68% and 26% shares of
total plantings of soybeans and corn. Also, the states with the greatest
concentration of organic soybean and corn crops are often states with above
average penetration of GM crops (eg, Iowa and Minnesota).
In
the case of canola (oilseed rape), the organic area has historically been
very low (under 0.1% of total canola plantings).
This very low level of planting essentially reflects agronomic and husbandry
difficulties in growing organic canola and the limited nature of the market
it is not related to any co-existence problems with GM canola.
Notes to editors
For
further details contact Graham Brookes Tel: +44 (0)1303 840958 or Peter
Barfoot +44 (0) 1300 321501. Email:
peter.barfoot@pgeconomics.co.uk or
graham.brookes@pgeconomics.co.uk
A pdf
version of the paper is available -
click here!
|