Global impact of biotech crops: socio-economic and environmental effects
1996-2006
Biotech crop
commercialization has resulted in significant global economic and
environmental benefits and is making important contributions to global
food security.
“Since 1996, biotech crop adoption has contributed to reducing the
release of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture, decreased
pesticide spraying and significantly boosted farmers’ incomes,” said
Graham Brookes, director of PG Economics, co-author of the
report.
“The technology has also made important contributions to increasing
the yields of many farmers, raising global production and trading
volumes of key crops. World price levels of crops like corn and
soybeans would also probably be higher than the current (record high)
levels if this technology had not been widely adopted by farmers.
These economic and environmental gains have also been greatest in
developing countries”
Previewing the findings of the comprehensive study, the key findings
are:
-
Biotech crops have contributed to significantly reducing the release
of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural practices. This
results from less fuel use and additional soil carbon storage from
reduced tillage with biotech crops. In 2006, this was equivalent to
removing 14.8 billion kg of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or
equal to removing nearly 6.6 million cars from the road for one
year;
-
Biotech crops have
reduced pesticide spraying by 286 million kg (-7.8%: equivalent to
about 40% of the annual volume of pesticide active ingredient
applied to arable crops in the European Union) and as a result
decreased the environmental impact associated with herbicide and
insecticide use on the area planted to biotech crops by 15.4%;
-
There have been
substantial net economic benefits at the farm level amounting to
nearly $7 billion in 2006 and $33.8 billion for the eleven year
period. The farm income gains in 2006 is equivalent to adding 3.8%
to the value of global production of the four main biotech crops of
soybeans, corn, canola and cotton;
-
Of the total farm
income benefit, 43% ($14.54 billion) has been due to yield gains,
with the balance arising from reductions in the cost of production.
Two thirds of the yield gain derive from adoption of insect
resistant crops and the balance from herbicide tolerant crops;
-
Farmers in
developing countries obtained the largest share of the farm income
gains in 2006 (54%) and over the eleven year period obtained 49% of
the total ($33.8 billion) gains;
-
The cost farmers
paid for accessing GM technology in 2006 was equal to 28% of the
total technology gains (a total of $9.6 billion inclusive of farm
income gains ($6.91 billion) plus cost of the technology payable to
the seed supply chain ($2.7 billion[1]));
-
For farmers in
developing countries the total cost of accessing the technology in
2006 was equal to about 17% of total technology gains, whilst for
farmers in developed countries the cost was 38% of the total
technology gains. Whilst circumstances vary between countries, the
higher share of total technology gains accounted for by farm income
gains in developing countries relative to the farm income share in
developed countries reflects factors such as weaker provision and
enforcement of intellectual property rights in developing
countries;
-
Since 1996, biotech
traits have added 53.3 million tonnes and 47.1 million tonnes
respectively to global production of soybeans and corn. The
technology has also contributed an extra 4.9 million tonnes of
cotton lint and 3.2 million tonnes of canola;
-
Production of
soybeans, corn, cotton and canola on the areas planted to biotech
crops, in 2006, were respectively +20%, +7%, +15% and +3% higher
than levels would have otherwise been if GM technology had not been
used by farmers;
-
If GM technology
had not been available to the (10 million plus) farmers using the
technology in 2006, maintaining global production levels at the
2006 levels would have required additional plantings of 4.6 million
ha of soybeans, 2 million ha of corn, 1.8 million ha of cotton and
0.15 million ha of canola;
-
Whilst the
additional volumes of food and fibre production arising from the use
of GM technology suggest a small impact relative to global
production, these volumes are far more significant in terms of
global trade in these commodities – equal to +17% of global trade on
soybeans, +11% of global trade in corn, +14%of global trade in
cotton lint and +3% of global trade in canola. This means that
global trade levels in these crops are probably significantly higher
than the levels would have been in the absence of use of GM
technology and therefore world prices of these traded crops in 2006
were probably lower than they would otherwise have been. In other
words, GM technology is having an important impact on contributing
to global supplies of these food, feed and fibre commodities and to
limiting the level of price increases that have occurred in the last
2-3 years.
For
additional information, contact Graham Brookes. Tel 00 44 (0) 1531
650123
www.pgeconomics.co.uk
|
|
Co-existence of
Genetically Modified (GM) and non-GM Maize
DEFRA consultation on
proposals for the management of genetically modified (GM), conventional and
organic crops
The Global GM
Market - implications for the European food chain -
German -
French language
Co-existence in
North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and
organic crops?
PG
Economics comments on the Greenpeace paper ‘GM and dairy cow feed: steps to
a GM-free future for the UK dairy industry’
Comments on
GM Foods: evaluating the Farm Scale Trials: report of the Environmental
Audit Committee of 2 March 2004
GM
and non GM arable crops can co-exist in the EU without problems
|