Home
Search
GM Crop News
Who we are
Publications

Projects

Expertise
> GM 10 Global Study
> GM Food Avoidence expensive
> GM Crops in Poland
> GM crops impact on UK farm profitability
> Co-existence of GM and non GM crops
> Bt maize in Spain
> Roundup Ready Soyabeans in Romania
Useful Links

>Farm Scale Trials

>Liability
>Market dynamics
>GM Debate
>GM crops & organics
>GM crops & LDC's
>GM yields
>GM pesticide use
Site Map
Contact
     

Research and debate around coexistence
 

 
Dear reader

As many of you are scientists involved in the research and debate around coexistence of genetically modified and conventional or organic crops, you may be aware of EU Recommendation 2003/556/EC which provides guidelines for the development of national strategies and best practices that, where necessary, can be applied to keep products from non-GM fields below the labeling threshold. This recommendation specifically states that: “Management measures for coexistence should reflect the best available scientific evidence on the probability and sources of admixture between GM and non-GM crops. They should permit the cultivation of GM and non-GM crops, whilst ensuring that non-GM crops remain below the legal thresholds for labeling and purity standards with respect to genetically modified food and feed and seeds, as defined by Community legislation.

Based on this recommendation, national strategies for coexistence are being developed across Europe. However, some national legislation and proposals do not take into account scientific evidence and do not respect key principles for coexistence such as proportionality, fairness and consistency. This may impede the ability of farmers and downstream users to adopt and utilize GM crops, due to a greatly reduced financial and legal attractiveness.

Against this background, I believe it would be worthwhile if a consensus statement from the scientific community is published to establish what the science really says.

I, in association with a number of scientists in Europe, have therefore drafted a text
summarizing the scientific stand relating to Bt maize (which has successfully coexisted with conventional and organic maize on a commercial scale for 8 years in the EU).  The intention is to publish this as a letter signed by scientists so that the statement from the scientific community is in the public domain.

Anyone willing to add their name and organisation to the list of signatories (open to view full document and list of signatories - PDF Format or html), should e-mail me direct to indicate their support.  If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

With kind regards,
 
Graham Brookes
PG Economics
graham.brookes@btinternet.com
 

Co-existence introduction

A copy of the report "Genetically Modified Maize - Pollen Movement and Crop Co-existence" can be downloaded - click here!

Co-existence of GM and non-GM crops: current experience and key principles

Co-existence in North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and organic crops?

GM and non GM arable crops can co-exist in the EU without problems: says new research paper

Co-existence of GM and non GM crops in the UK can occur without problems

Co-existence of GM and non GM crops: economic and market perspectives - PDF format

Co-existence of GM and non GM crops: case study of maize grown in Spain - PDF format

Co-existence of GM and non GM crops in the UK can occur without problems - PDF format

EU Commission report on co-existence

EU Paper on GMO's in seeds


Independent and objective consultants servicing the agricultural, agricultural supply trade, rural and food industries.


©PG Economics Limited 2004-2008
Registered Office: Stafford House, 10 Prince of Wales Road, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 1PW, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1300 321501 (P Barfoot) +44 (0)1531 650123 (G Brookes) Fax: +44 (0)1531 650099

www.pgeconomics.co.uk

Disclaimer: A number of different sources of information were used in compiling PG Economics reports and website files. Our reports and files contain some forecasts and estimates. It therefore remains possible that the reports and web files contain inaccuracies. PG Economics and its Directors do not accept any liability arising from any such errors or omissions and shall not be liable for any loss or damage suffered as a result of any information given in its publications and website.